Auto-generated recap of a concluded election. Figures are the certified result. This article can be edited; edits are preserved and not overwritten by regeneration.
At a glance
| Winner | Runner-up | |
|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Sean Oppenheimer | Deprince |
| Party | Democratic Party | Farmer-Labor Party |
| Electoral vote | 286 | 252 |
| States carried | 19 | 34 |
| Popular vote | 70,785,081 (50.64%) | 69,008,929 (49.36%) |
Overview
Democratic nominee Sean Oppenheimer secured the presidency in 1972, defeating Farmer-Labor nominee Deprince with 286 electoral votes to 252. Oppenheimer achieved a narrow national popular vote victory, earning 70,785,081 votes (50.64%) against Deprince's 69,008,929 votes (49.36%), a difference of 1,776,152 votes. Despite carrying only 19 states to Deprince's 34, Oppenheimer assembled an efficient coalition by sweeping crucial high-population battlegrounds.
How the Night Unfolded
Early reporting favored Deprince, who built a substantial initial lead. By turn 960, Deprince held 107 projected electoral votes to Oppenheimer's 37. As broader batches reported at turn 970, Deprince surged to 339 projected electoral votes, commanding an apparent majority before key western and midwestern returns narrowed the gap. Oppenheimer steadily clawed back over the next sequence of turns, advancing to 244 electoral votes by turn 979.
After a brief plateau and a slight dip to 234 at turn 987, the race experienced a decisive shift at turn 995. A massive swing of late-reporting states pushed Oppenheimer directly across the 270 threshold to 284 electoral votes, dropping Deprince to 253. Oppenheimer reached a peak of 289 projected votes at turn 998 before the count settled into the final certified balance of 286 to 252.
Notable Races
The election hinged on critical, razor-thin margins in the nation's largest states:
- California (40 EV): Oppenheimer captured the night's largest prize by a knife-edge margin of 0.4% (50.2% to 49.8%), delivering the necessary electoral weight to capture the presidency.
- Texas (32 EV): Deprince kept the race tight by winning Texas with just 50.4% of the vote, edging Oppenheimer by 0.8%.
- Maine (4 EV) & Maine's 2nd District (0 EV): Deprince won statewide Maine by 1.2% (50.6% to 49.4%), but Oppenheimer managed a split in Maine's 2nd Congressional District, taking it by just 0.3% (50.1% to 49.8%).
- Indiana (15 EV) & Washington (10 EV): Other tight contests included Indiana, won by Deprince by 1.6%, and Washington, which went to Oppenheimer by 1.7%.
Outside of the close margins, both candidates possessed dominant regional bastions. Deprince secured overwhelming margins in Missouri (70.4%, winning by 40.7%), Arizona (69.1%, winning by 38.3%), the District of Columbia (67.2%, winning by 34.3%), and Oregon (67.1%, winning by 34.1%). Oppenheimer's strongest state performances came from South Carolina (65.1%, winning by 30.2%), Iowa (62.0%, winning by 24.1%), and Ohio (60.9%, winning by 21.9%).
What It Means
The 1972 election demonstrated the power of vote distribution over raw geographic control. Deprince carried a vast majority of the map—winning 34 out of 53 contesting units, including deep sweeps across the Great Plains, Mountain West, and parts of the Northeast like Massachusetts and New Jersey.
However, Oppenheimer's coalition focused heavily on high-yield delegate targets. By pairing major industrial states such as New York (37 EV), Illinois (25 EV), and Pennsylvania (26 EV) with decisive wins in Ohio (28 EV) and California (40 EV), Oppenheimer successfully offset Deprince's broad map advantage, converting a slim 1.28-percentage-point popular vote margin into an insurmountable 286-vote electoral majority.
Results by state
| State | EV | Winner | Share | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AK | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 54.5% | +8.9 |
| AL | 10 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 61.9% | +23.8 |
| AR | 6 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 58.6% | +17.2 |
| AZ | 5 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 69.1% | +38.3 |
| CA | 40 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 50.2% | +0.4 |
| CO | 7 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 54.9% | +9.9 |
| CT | 8 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.3% | +2.5 |
| DC | 2 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 67.2% | +34.3 |
| DE | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 53.7% | +7.3 |
| FL | 12 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 52.5% | +5 |
| GA | 12 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 55.1% | +10.2 |
| HI | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.8% | +3.7 |
| IA | 8 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 62% | +24.1 |
| ID | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 52.7% | +5.5 |
| IL | 25 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 57% | +13.9 |
| IN | 15 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 50.8% | +1.6 |
| KS | 6 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 55.5% | +11.1 |
| KY | 9 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 52.8% | +5.6 |
| LA | 11 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 54.2% | +8.5 |
| MA | 12 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 54.9% | +9.7 |
| MD | 10 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 58.9% | +17.9 |
| ME | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 50.6% | +1.2 |
| ME_CD1 | 0 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.3% | +2.7 |
| ME_CD2 | 0 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 50.1% | +0.3 |
| MI | 25 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 56.8% | +13.5 |
| MN | 10 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 55.7% | +11.4 |
| MO | 10 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 70.4% | +40.7 |
| MS | 7 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 54.7% | +9.4 |
| MT | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 55.3% | +10.5 |
| NC | 14 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 55.3% | +10.6 |
| ND | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.9% | +3.9 |
| NE | 5 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.5% | +2.9 |
| NH | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 54.4% | +8.8 |
| NJ | 16 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 61.8% | +23.7 |
| NM | 5 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 53.6% | +7.1 |
| NV | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 56% | +12 |
| NY | 37 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 56.9% | +13.8 |
| OH | 28 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 60.9% | +21.9 |
| OK | 7 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 50.6% | +1.3 |
| OR | 6 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 67.1% | +34.1 |
| PA | 26 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 55.9% | +11.7 |
| RI | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 57% | +13.9 |
| SC | 8 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 65.1% | +30.2 |
| SD | 4 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 51.7% | +3.4 |
| TN | 11 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 52.9% | +5.9 |
| TX | 32 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 50.4% | +0.8 |
| UT | 5 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 52.3% | +4.7 |
| VA | 14 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 53.8% | +7.5 |
| VT | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 52.4% | +4.8 |
| WA | 10 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 50.8% | +1.7 |
| WI | 12 EV | Sean Oppenheimer (DEM) | 59.6% | +19.3 |
| WV | 6 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 65.4% | +30.9 |
| WY | 3 EV | Deprince (FLP) | 52.8% | +5.7 |